Friday, September 10, 2010

eggshells - or assholes?

And this thing about my brother feeling like he's 'walking on eggshells' with me: I've googled many a phrase in my day, and it seems to me I've come up with any number of self-help books and websites touting the idea that you 'shouldn't have to walk on eggshells,' and that a person who 'requires' this of you is somehow dysfunctional, damaging and otherwise basically fucked up; and at the same time, there seem to be an *equal* number of websites that hold just the opposite: That insensitive, clueless people are mean and narcissistic and you should avoid them like the plague.

I guess it's just the same old 'dominator/dominated' paradigm that's been with us for millenia, only it's taken me a while to see it. And I think I *have* seen it, before, many times, and then I 'forget'. And then am reminded. Over and over and over. Some kind of amnesia? The flip side of the essential 3 D's that allow you to escape from the painful cognitive dissonance that makes up so much of life?

As to the title of this,'eggshells - or assholes?' I'd say it's neither. People are neither predictable nor consistent, much though we'd like them to be. We like to categorize *other* people while *hating* to be pigeonholed ourselves. We expect a kind of consistency from others that allows us to move around them as if they were furniture, instead of dynamic, moving, ever-changing, autonomous-to-whatever-degree-true-autonomy-is-possible-in-an-interconnected-world full of beings with MINDS OF THEIR OWN.

And it makes me realize, *I'm* this way. Not everyone is. My parents held me to higher standards than they held themselves to; but I think my youngest brother, for example, is actually pretty fluid and flexible when it comes to dealing with other people, or at least with *me* (maybe because I *demand* it?) But he also *must* have to be fairly flexible to be involved with my sister-in-law, because she's a force of nature (meaning unpredictable) if there ever was one. Which I sort of envy. That freedom, I mean, to be whatever you ARE, without apology, explanation, or even any kind of (apparent, anyway) self-recrimination or even self-reflection. (Though a friend of hers made some comments once that suggest that sister-in-law is at least *somewhat* aware of her own behavior. She just doesn't *admit* it, at least, not to *me*. Not surprising, really, given our - track record? - so far.)

2 comments:

Michael Finley said...

"We like to categorize *other* people while *hating* to be pigeonholed ourselves."

I never noticed that.

My parents expected me to be able to do what they did not and could not and when I did tried to debase it.

This describes my relationship with my family. I can have the lowest score in golf and somehow I sill lose.

I actually tested this theory.

If I were to win the NBA championship playing by myself they would ask why I did not do it sooner and maybe now I can accomplish something.

Note I may not get notified of comments on my comments as I messed up with wordpress. I got it now.

grasshopper said...

Yeah, it took me a long time to notice! And, as you point out, people *also* hold others to high and/or different standards than they hold themselves to.

But, to be fair, I've noticed this in myself - I think it's pretty hard to have any viewpoint other than one's own, really, since it's *this* brain we're thinking with, *these* eyes we see with, *this* set of life experiences to which we compare nearly everything.

It takes a lot of *work* to see another person's point of view, and it seems like a lot of people never find themselves in a situation that forces them to do that.

Maybe it's once again a power thing. There's an idea out there about master/slave or dominator and dominated: The one in the 'lower' position tends to know *everything* about the person with more power, because it's in the best interest of the one with less power not to piss the more powerful one off.

But the reverse doesn't hold true - the powerful one has no need to understand the less powerful one, because he can always *force* the less powerful one to do whatever he wants. No incentive, basically.

I hate the thing of feeling like you have to constantly prove yourself to parents who aren't all that accomplished themselves. It's like they're always testing you, and you can't ever pass the test, or win. Whenever you look like you might 'win', they just change the rules.

It's a power game, and it sucks.